Frameworks overlap far more than they differ.
Access control, change management, encryption, vendor oversight, incident response. Nearly every framework asks for the same underlying practices in its own vocabulary.
Systems that store controls per framework cannot see that. To them, the SOC 2 access control and the ISO 27001 access control are unrelated records that happen to describe the same thing. So the evidence gets collected twice, the policy gets written twice, and the review happens twice.
EasyAudit normalizes every framework into a single universal control set. You operate one program. Each framework draws from it.
Frameworks you subscribe to.
Each generates its own control set, procedures, and evidence requirements, drawn from the same universal controls.
- 01
SOC 1
For organizations whose services affect their customers’ financial reporting. If your customers’ auditors need assurance about your controls, this is the report they are asking for.
See the SOC 1 path - 02
SOC 2
The report North American enterprise buyers ask for before they sign. Type I attests to your controls at a point in time. Type II attests to how they operated across a period, which is what most customers actually want.
See the SOC 2 path - 03
ISO 27001
The international certification for an information security management system. If your deals are European or global, this is the one that gets asked for, and it is a certification rather than a report.
See the ISO 27001 path - 04
ISO 42001
The management system standard for artificial intelligence. New, and moving quickly from differentiator to requirement for companies shipping AI into regulated markets.
See the ISO 42001 path - 05
ISO 9001
Quality management. Frequently a contractual condition in manufacturing, industrial and supply chain relationships rather than a security requirement, which is why it is often the framework nobody planned for.
See the ISO 9001 path - 06
NIST CSF 2.0
A voluntary framework that stopped being voluntary in practice. Enterprise and government-adjacent buyers use it as the common language for describing security posture.
See the NIST CSF 2.0 path - 07
CMMC
Required across the defense supply chain for organizations handling controlled unclassified information. Certification level is set by the contract, and the contract does not wait.
See the CMMC path
Quality management is its own discipline. We treat it that way.
ISO 9001 is a quality framework, not a security one, and pretending its requirements overlap with SOC 2 would be the kind of shortcut an auditor unravels in an afternoon. So it runs as its own dedicated track: quality controls generated the same way, managed on the same platform, by the same expert and officer, mapped to nothing they don't genuinely share. Same service. Honest architecture.
Name a framework.
Adding a framework means mapping it to controls that already exist, not building a program from nothing. So the answer to an unusual request is normally yes, and normally soon.
If a customer or a regulator is asking you for something not listed above, tell us in your Simulation and we will tell you what it takes.
See where your organization stands.
The Compliance Simulation is a scored, gapped, dated, priced diagnostic of your path to readiness, run on your real environment. It is free, it takes about 75 minutes of scheduled time, and the report is yours either way.