AuditBoard Competitors/Alternatives: Top 10 Based on Reviews
Managing compliance shouldn't feel like climbing Mount Everest.
Yet companies spend months wrestling with complex platforms, burning through resources and missing opportunities.
The landscape has shifted.
Modern alternatives to AuditBoard now offer streamlined automation, intuitive interfaces, and faster implementation - without compromising on security.
Let's explore the top 10 platforms changing how businesses handle their compliance needs in 2025.
Why consider alternatives to AuditBoard?
AuditBoard offers comprehensive compliance management features, but several limitations could impact your organization's efficiency and budget:
The platform's steep learning curve can slow down team adoption and implementation. New users often struggle with the extensive feature set, requiring additional training time.
The platform's complexity often requires dedicated resources for management and maintenance, adding to the total cost of ownership.
While the interface is user-friendly, some users report technical issues and slow performance, particularly with editing tools.
The pricing structure poses challenges for smaller organizations. Costs vary based on the number of controls tested and additional modules needed, making it difficult to predict expenses.
Customization options are limited compared to modern alternatives. Organizations needing tailored workflows often find themselves constrained by the platform's rigid structure.
Top 10 AuditBoard alternatives to try in 2025
Ever wondered why some companies breeze through SOC 2 compliance while others struggle for months?
The secret lies in choosing the right compliance automation platform.
Let's dive in.
1. EasyAudit
You're chasing that big enterprise deal.
Your product is ready.
Your team is ready.
But there's one roadblock: SOC 2 compliance.
Most companies spend 6-8 months and $100,000+ getting SOC 2 certified.
That's 6-8 months of watching potential deals shrink or disappear entirely.
Here's the truth about compliance tools: They hand you vague templates and leave you to figure out the details.
"The company maintains secure access controls."
But wait.
Who exactly maintains these controls? What systems do they use? How often are they updated? When do they get reviewed?
This vagueness isn't just annoying - it's costing you time and money.
Every unclear control means hours spent figuring out the details. Hours that delay your compliance. Hours that keep you from closing deals.
This is where EasyAudit changes everything. Our AI doesn't just give you templates. It learns about your business and generates crystal-clear, specific controls like this:
"The IT Director at [Your Company] manages access permissions through Okta, with mandatory password rotations every 60 days and immediate deactivation of credentials when employees leave."
See the difference?
No guesswork. No ambiguity.
But wait. There's more.
Key features
- AI-powered custom security controls that eliminate weeks of manual work
- Automated evidence documentation generation
- Dashboard to track your compliance progress
- Direct connections with auditor firms at competitive rates
- Built-in penetration testing (mandatory for SOC 2)
- Flat-fee pricing with zero surprises
The Results?
- Your compliance time drops from 6-8 months to 2-3 months
- Your total costs cut in half
- Your enterprise deals stay intact
Is EasyAudit right for you?
If you're a decision-maker in a company with 10-100 employees, pursuing enterprise deals, needing SOC 2 compliance fast, and don't want to waste time with vague templates – EasyAudit is for you.
Book a demo and see how easy it is to get compliant.
2. Vanta
Vanta is a compliance automation platform specializing in SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA compliance management.
The platform offers continuous compliance monitoring and automated evidence collection through its extensive integration network.
Their system connects with over 300 tools and services, including major cloud providers like AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Pros:
- User-friendly interface suitable for technical and non-technical users
- Strong customer support with personalized guidance
- Extensive integration capabilities
- Automated evidence collection
- Comprehensive reporting and dashboard features
Cons:
- Higher pricing compared to competitors - starting at $7,500 annually, but costs rise as you add more integrations or additional services.
- Some users report limited customization options for unique compliance needs
- More manual input required than advertised
- Customer service responsiveness issues reported
Vanta is best suited for mid-sized to large businesses with substantial compliance budgets.
While their automation capabilities are solid, the high price point and customization limitations make it less ideal for smaller organizations or those with unique compliance requirements.
3. Scrut Automation
Scrut Automation is a compliance automation platform that helps organizations achieve and maintain SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR compliance.
The platform continuously monitors security controls and automates evidence collection across cloud environments.
It integrates with major cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud for automated configuration testing.
Pros:
- Supports multiple compliance frameworks
- Automated evidence collection and mapping
- 24/7 security control monitoring
- Extensive integration options
Cons:
- Limited customization options reported by users
- Steep learning curve for new users
- The platform starts at approximately $12,000 per year, positioning it in the mid-range price segment for compliance automation tools.
- Relatively new player in the compliance space
Scrut Automation works best for cloud-native organizations managing multiple compliance frameworks.
While its automation capabilities save time, companies should consider the initial learning curve and setup complexity before committing.
4. Hyperproof
Hyperproof is a compliance management platform that automates evidence collection and streamlines compliance operations.
The platform offers customizable frameworks for SOC 2, NIST, and PCI-DSS compliance standards.
It integrates with over 50 applications, including Microsoft SharePoint, GitHub, and Slack.
Pros:
- Strong customer support with comprehensive assistance
- Intuitive user interface for varying technical skill levels
- Centralized compliance management system
- Extensive integration capabilities
- Wide range of framework support
Cons:
- Complex and time-consuming initial setup
- Limited reporting functionality compared to competitors
- Browser compatibility issues reported, especially with Firefox
- With pricing starting at $12,000 per year, it represents a significant investment.
Hyperproof is best suited for mid-market to enterprise organizations seeking a comprehensive compliance management solution.
5. Sprinto
Sprinto is a compliance automation platform designed for cloud-hosted companies. The software helps organizations achieve and maintain compliance with SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR standards.
Their platform focuses on automating evidence collection, audit management, and policy enforcement.
Pros:
- High user ratings for ease of use (4.8/5)
- Automated compliance monitoring and evidence collection
- Broad compliance framework coverage
- Strong integration capabilities with cloud services
- Expert-guided support throughout compliance process
Cons:
- Some users reported delays in customer support response times
- Platform adaptation can be challenging during urgent tasks
- One user reported concerns with refund policies and business practices
Their pricing starts at $30,000 annually, making it a considerable investment that requires careful evaluation. Sprinto works well for mid-sized to large tech companies.
6. Secureframe
Secureframe is a compliance automation platform that helps organizations achieve and maintain SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI DSS compliance. Integrates with over 200 cloud services and tools, including AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure.
Pros:
- Comprehensive integration ecosystem
- Comprehensive automation of policy creation and evidence collection
- User-friendly interface suitable for compliance beginners
- Expert guidance throughout the compliance journey
- Competitive pricing for enterprise features
Cons:
- Limited customization options for unique compliance needs
- Complex pricing structure that may confuse smaller businesses
- Customer support representatives sometimes struggle with complex compliance questions
The platform's pricing starts at $2,000 per year, with additional costs based on frameworks and employee count.
The platform's strength lies in automation and integration capabilities, but businesses requiring extensive customization should carefully evaluate if the solution meets their specific needs.
7. Archer
Archer is an integrated risk management platform that combines audit management, compliance tracking, and incident management capabilities.
The platform offers customizable workflows and robust reporting tools for detailed audit insights.
Pros:
- User-friendly interface with intuitive navigation
- Highly scalable for organizations of all sizes
- Strong customer support and training resources
- Comprehensive reporting and analytics tools
- Effective collaboration features
Cons:
- Higher pricing compared to alternatives
- Complex interface with steep learning curve
- Resource-intensive implementation process
- Limited customization options
- Users have reported the data entry process to be tedius.
Archer is for large enterprises that need a comprehensive risk management solution and have the resources for implementation.
While the platform offers robust features, its complexity and pricing make it less ideal for smaller organizations or those seeking a straightforward audit management tool.
8. Workiva
Workiva is a cloud-based reporting platform that streamlines data management, compliance, and reporting processes.
The platform consolidates internal control tests and documents in one database, enabling real-time collaboration across teams.
Their solution focuses on financial reporting and regulatory compliance, with strong automation capabilities for reporting workflows.
Pros:
- Powerful automation features for reporting
- Real-time collaboration features
- Strong data connectivity across systems
- Comprehensive version control system
Cons:
- High subscription costs starting at $75,000 annually
- Users report frequent performance issues and system downtimes
- Limited document editing capabilities
- Steep learning curve for new users
Workiva works best for large enterprises with significant reporting needs and budget flexibility.
While its automation and collaboration features impress, the high costs and performance issues make it less suitable for smaller organizations or those requiring offline capabilities.
9. Onspring
Onspring is a cloud-based GRC platform that emphasizes flexibility and customization.
The platform features a no-code, drag-and-drop interface for creating workflows and applications.
Their solution focuses on automation and real-time reporting, with extensive customization options for different industries.
Pros:
- Highly customizable platform with no-code functionality
- Centralized compliance repository
- Strong reporting and dashboard capabilities
- Multiple support options including live chat and phone support
- FedRAMP moderate environment certification
Cons:
- Some users report limited features compared to specialized solutions
- Cost concerns raised regarding value for specific modules
- Pricing requires direct contact, making budget planning challenging
- Initial setup may require significant time investment despite no-code interface
Onspring works best for organizations that need a flexible, customizable GRC solution and have the resources to invest in setup and configuration.
While it offers comprehensive features, companies with specific needs might find better value in specialized solutions.
10. CURA
CURA is a comprehensive governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) platform that integrates various risk management functions into a single solution.
The platform offers customizable workflows and robust reporting capabilities for detailed risk assessment and compliance tracking.
Pros:
- Highly customizable workflows and processes
- User-friendly interface with intuitive features
- Strong reporting capabilities
- Reliable customer support
Cons:
- Initial setup can be challenging for new users
- Some users report a steep learning curve due to extensive features
- Higher pricing compared to competitors
CURA is best suited for larger organizations seeking a comprehensive GRC solution with extensive customization options.
The higher price point and steeper learning curve make it less ideal for small-to medium-sized companies or those new to GRC software.
Side-by-side comparison of AuditBoard and it's alternatives
AuditBoard alternatives offer varying features, pricing models, and capabilities.
Here's a comparison overview to help you make an informed decision:
Choosing the wrong compliance platform isn't just an inconvenience - it's a direct hit to your revenue.
Our deep-dive analysis revealed some uncomfortable truths about the compliance automation market:
Most platforms try to be everything to everyone. They offer dozens of frameworks but master none.
They hide costs in complex pricing structures that balloon your budget.
The Fastest Solution for SOC 2 Compliance
Here's the reality:
Every month spent wrestling with compliance is another month watching deals shrink or disappear.
That's the true cost of choosing the wrong platform.
EasyAudit takes a radically different approach.
Instead of spreading ourselves thin across every compliance framework under the sun, we've mastered one thing: getting you SOC 2 certified in half the time at half the cost.
Think about it:
- Custom security controls tailored to your business
- Automated evidence documentation that saves countless of hours
- Built-in penetration testing (mandatory for SOC 2)
- Direct connections with auditors at competitive rates
- Real-time compliance tracking
- True flat-fee pricing - no surprises, no hidden costs
Ready to stop leaving money on the table?